Editorial standards
How FunSurveys reviews survey sites
Our aim is to help you make an informed choice with clear sources and realistic limits. A legitimate service can still be a poor fit for your country, time or privacy preferences.
1. Start with primary sources
We use a provider’s own participant, reward, eligibility and privacy pages to describe its programme. An official source establishes what the provider says; it does not independently establish payout reliability. We link to sources beside the claims they support and date substantive reviews.
2. Distinguish research from testing
Desk research is labelled as such. To describe first-hand testing, we require a dated record of the country, account context, activities, time including screening, rewards approved and payments actually received. Any published evidence must protect personal information. Without those records, we do not claim “tested”, “verified payouts” or an effective hourly earnings benchmark.
Our country tester network invites contributors to document local experiences under an agreed paid brief. The seven-day testing handbookdefines signup checks, session logs, screenshot permissions and the distinction between a withdrawal request and money received. Recruiting contributors does not establish that a provider has been tested. Editors require the actual dated records, publication permission and a clear statement of the sample and its limits before adding a tested finding.
3. Explain comparisons without invented precision
We compare participation models, eligibility, payout conditions, privacy and practical limitations. We do not assign star ratings, numerical scores or typical income figures without a published method and supporting evidence. Provider-advertised incentives must be attributed and kept separate from measured results.
4. Label commercial content
Listing pages can include a featured survey site before the researched entries. Each placement is labelled “Commercial placement” beside the product name and links. It is promotional, not an independent ranking, and is excluded from documented match counts. Country eligibility and reward conditions still need to be checked directly.
Commercial product resources are labelled as product information or business resources. We do not describe them as independent reviews or use their placement as evidence of payout reliability.
Advertisements may help fund this site. If a link is paid or earns a commission, it must be identified near the link and marked as sponsored. Our updated consumer comparison uses direct provider links without referral parameters.
5. Publish only traceable reader evidence
We do not publish generated comments, invented reviewer identities or synthetic testimonials. Reader submissions require a source record and permission to publish. An anecdote remains an anecdote; it is not a representative earnings estimate. Public comment submission is not currently offered on our updated articles.
6. Review the legacy archive
Older imported reviews and unsubstantiated earnings guides are withheld and marked noindex while checked. Each page needs a decision: rewrite with sources, merge with a relevant guide, redirect to a matching replacement, or remain withdrawn. A change to an import timestamp does not count as a fresh editorial review.
7. Correct material errors openly
For a correction, send the URL, disputed statement and supporting source to info@fun-surveys.com. The editor checks the evidence and updates the affected page. Substantive corrections should explain what changed rather than silently resetting the date.
Meet the editor · Use the safety checklist · Find your country guide
